ICISS conference submissions
are subject to a double-blind peer review
process by reviewers. Reviewers are members
the conference’s Technical Committee of
experts in fields specifically matching the
conference topics.
Technical Committee members provide the
vital link with the profession that makes
the conference a success. The reviews help
the Program Committee select which papers to
accept and reject. Additionally, your
reviews help the authors of papers make
their papers and presentations stronger.
Finally, your suggestions help the Program
Chairs select the outstanding papers.
Criteria for Being a
Reviewer
- Holding a doctorate in the relevant field
- Be an established expert in the field
- Having an excellent publications track record in high impact,
peer-reviewed journals
- Adequate general knowledge of the sub-fields
- Past experience of reviewing abstracts/ full papers and being in
editorial boards
- Fluency in language and grammar
Benefits for Being a Reviewer
- Listing as an Technical Committee member on the conference
webpage and in the printed proceedings
- Eligibility for special discount for the registration fee
- Getting an electronic reviewer certificate
- Keep up to date on the researches in your field
- Opportunity to develop your career and critical thinking skills
essential to research
- Bolstering of resumes for promotion and/or tenure.
The final decision regarding the selection
will be made by the Technical Committee
Chair. If you would like to be considered to serve
on the Technical Committee, please send your latest CV to E-mail:
iciss.org@outlook.com